“That is an incredible and distinctive murals.” – Martin Nicolaus.
I had my first inquiry from somebody who wished to purchase a duplicate of my new pop-up e-book. This offered me with a dilemma as a result of I had by no means meant to promote copies of the e-book. The rationale for not promoting seems in the e-book – on pages eight and eleven. The character of capital is that “actual wealth should tackle a selected kind distinct from itself, completely not similar with it, so as to turn out to be an object of manufacturing in any respect.” And…
…actual wealth is the developed productive energy of all people. The measure of wealth is then not any longer, in any means, labour time, however reasonably disposable time.
Actual wealth thus can’t be measured in cash. Any worth I connected to the e-book can be arbitrary. Why not $62,885,000? “However you aren’t Andy Warhol!” O.Ok., then $62,885? $6,289? $62.89 plus transport? A banana duct taped to a wall bought for $6.2 million final week.
In The Unknown Unknown Marx, I wrote: Towards the tip of his 1968 essay, “The Unknown Marx,” Martin Nicolaus quoted Marx’s enumeration of 4 boundaries to manufacturing beneath capital that “expose the idea of overproduction, the basic contradiction of developed capital.” Nicolaus certified what Marx meant by overproduction to be “[not] merely ‘extra stock’; reasonably, he means extra productive energy extra usually.”
Marx’s enumeration of these boundaries – the notorious ‘fetters’ on the event of the productive forces – gives the textual content of web page eight of my e-book.
 |
| Web page eight of Marx’s Fetters: a remedial studying |
“It “would require a e-book,” Nicolaus then noticed, to current “a correct evaluation of the implications of those reasonably cryptic theses.” In lieu of that evaluation, he supplied a synopsis that “these 4 ‘limits’ signify not more than completely different facets of the contradiction between ‘forces of manufacturing’ and ‘social relations of manufacturing’.”
My competition is that the decoder ring for these ‘cryptic theses’ seems within the enigmatic assertion, “The entire growth of wealth rests on the creation of disposable time.” The paragraph wherein that assertion seems offers a concise clarification of what it means. Two paragraphs earlier, Marx had quoted from the 1821 pamphlet, The Supply and Treatment of the Nationwide Difficulities, “Wealth is disposable time and nothing extra…”
Marx’s modification of the phrase from id to contingency is decisive. Disposable time is important for the event of wealth however not enough. This contingency returns with a vengence within the 4 boundaries, culminating within the assertion that “actual wealth has to tackle a selected kind distinct from itself… to turn out to be an object of manufacturing in any respect.”
 |
| The entire growth of wealth… |
Right here is my cnc chopping machine doing its factor: